ag亚游娱乐|官方网站导读:children. The Syrian Government denied responsibility. But Obama, in spite of the Syrian Government’s protests, insisted on using military force.  One year ago, Obama warned the Syrian Government against using chemical weapons, calling it a “red line” that Washington would use to conduct a mili
  The Middle East is once again in the center of chaos as of late August. U.S. President Barack Obama, who won a Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, has been intent on launching a military strike against Syria since August 28 and has sought authorization from Congress before taking military action.

   A hard decision

  The White House sent Congress a draft resolution on August 31 seeking approval of a military strike in order to “deter, disrupt, prevent and degrade the potential” for future use of chemical weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in Syria. It promised that military action will be “limited” and will not involve sending U.S. troops to Syria. Obama’s decision was aimed at punishing Bashar al-Assad’s Government for the alleged August 21 use of chemical weapons on its citizens. On August 21, a chemical weapon attack hit the suburbs of Damascus, the Syrian capital, reportedly killing at least 1,429 people, including 426 children. The Syrian Government denied responsibility. But Obama, in spite of the Syrian Government’s protests, insisted on using military force.

  One year ago, Obama warned the Syrian Government against using chemical weapons, calling it a “red line” that Washington would use to conduct a military attack.

  “Obama’s accusation against the Syrian Government is untenable. There’s no concrete evidence proving which side in Syria had used chemical weapons. What can be confirmed now is only existence of chemical weapons in Syria,” Liu Yueqin, a senior research fellow on Syrian studies with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), said to Beijing Review. She pointed out that without the UN Chemical Weapons Inspection Team’s investigation report, such accusation is not creditable.

  “China’s position is clear-cut. China is firmly opposed to the use of chemical weapons by any party in Syria,” said Hong Lei, spoke**an of Chi
上一篇: 探索ChinaChina试述Dataag亚游娱乐|官方网站写法 下一篇: 没有了